Saturday, October 31, 2009

From temporary wife to prostitute: sexuality and economic change in early modern Southeast Asia

Barbara Watson Andaya (Hawaii University at Manoa, USA)

Journal of Women's History, 1/1/1998

Foreign traders entering Southeast Asia in the early 16th century found entering into temporary marriages with local women was a common practice. These women helped traders conduct business, but traders increasingly preferred the company of slaves or former slaves who combined the roles of servants and sexual partners. Growing patriarchal states, expanded urban centers, and increased foreign males turned temporary wives into prostitutes.
The historical study of women and gender in Southeast Asia is relatively new, and has concentrated almost exclusively on the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. This article provides a deeper base to the discussion by examining changing attitudes toward sexual relationships between foreign men and local women during the early modern period. When Europeans arrived in the region in the early sixteenth century, they found that foreign traders commonly entered into a temporary marriage with local women who also helped them in trade. The rise of patriarchal states, penetration of elite values, increase in the number of foreign males, expansion of urban centers, and growth of prostitution acted together to change attitudes toward sexuality. Because foreigners increasingly preferred slaves or ex-slaves who could act as both servants and sexual partners, the status of the temporary wife was permanently eroded.
In March 1671, from his post in Palembang on Sumatra's east coast, a representative of the Dutch East India Company (VOC)(2) penned his customary letter to his superiors in the VOC capital of Batavia (modern Jakarta). There was little noteworthy to report, but he was concerned about the "intolerable cruelty" Palembang authorities were inflicting on widows of Chinese merchants. He described an incident that had occurred the previous day involving "Encik Koey's widow," a former slave originally from Batavia. To compel this woman to disclose the location of her husband's wealth, her hands had been thrust into boiling oil. To add to her torment, her head was squeezed between two planks, so that with horribly swollen features and protruding eyes she no longer appeared human.(3)
Apart from several works on prostitution, there has been no historical investigation into changing attitudes toward sexuality in Southeast Asia, despite the fact that the "high status" of women is often cited as characteristic of the region.(4) In this context, the horrific treatment meted out to "Encik Koey's widow" calls for closer attention, for she exemplifies a type of woman who became all too common during the early modern period (ca. 1500-1800): a low-ranking outsider, often a slave or former slave, who provided domestic and sexual services to a foreigner without the respect normally accorded a married woman. But the stigma attached to common law wives and the condemnation of women who exchanged sex for material gain was not a traditional feature of Southeast Asian societies. The processes underlying this attitudinal shift are a critical but as yet unresearched aspect of the history of sexuality in this part of the world.
Welcoming Foreigners
When Europeans began to frequent Southeast Asia at the beginning of the sixteenth century, they generally were struck by the hospitality they received. Virtually everywhere, locals assumed that recent arrivals would need assistance to help them deal with an unfamiliar environment, and the most efficacious way of accomplishing this was to supply the newcomer with a network of kin. Adoption of the foreigner as a son or brother was me way of establishing putative family links, and this could be most effectively achieved by providing a local woman as a companion and, if desired, a sexual partner.(5) The kind of reception that resulted is admirably described by William Dampier (1652-1715), who arrived in the port of Mindanao (southern Philippines) in 1686.
When Strangers arrive here, the Mindanao Men win come aboard and
invite them to their Houses and inquire who has a Comrade (which
word I believe they have from the Spaniards) or a Pagally(6) and who
has not. A Comrade is a familiar Male friend; a Pagally is an innocent
Platonick Friend of the other Sex. All Strangers are in a manner oblig'd
to accept of this acquaintance and familiarity, which must be first
purchased with a small present, and afterwards confirmed with some
gift or other to continue the acquaintance: and as often as the Stranger
goes ashore, he is welcome to his Comrade or Pagally's house, where
he may be entertained for his Money, to Eat, Drink or Sleep; and
complimented, as often as he comes ashore, with Tobacco and Betel-Nut,
which is all the Entertainment he must expect gratis. The richest
men's wives are allowed the freedom to converse with her Pagally in
publick, and may give or receive Presents from him.(7)
Although Dampier refers to "pagallies" as "platonic friends," it is apparent that frequently these relationships were ones of sexual intimacy, for soon "near a third of our men" had moved ashore "to live with their wives and pagallies."(8) Such arrangements were typical of the temporary marriages that were a feature of Southeast Asian economic life. Southeast Asian men always preferred to trade in places where they already had relatives who could furnish companionship and assistance, and assumed others would feel the same. By recognizing a woman as the wife of a foreigner, be it a few days or months or even years, temporary marriages helped create the kinship networks critical to the whole commercial structure. The female "promiscuity" that displeased early Chinese observers thus reflected not merely relaxed ideas regarding interaction between men and women but the use of sexual relationships to welcome traders into the community, Ma Huan's description of Siam in the fifteenth century nicely captures these attitudes. "If a married woman is very intimate with one of our men from the Central country, wine and food are provided and they drink and sit and sleep together. The husband is quite calm and takes no exception to it; indeed, he says, `My wife is beautiful and the man from the Central Country is delighted with her.'"(9)
By the time of the first European arrivals in Southeast Asia, a continuum that linked hospitality, sex, and gifts was already wen established. When Miguel de Legazpi reached the Philippines in 1565, female traders converged on the Spanish camp to exchange both wine and sexual services with his soldiers. "Many of the wives and daughters of the chiefs come to the camp along with the other women .... This is one of their customs and it is exercised with all strangers from the outside. The very first thing they do is to provide them with women.'"(10) A hundred years later, Dampier noted that the offering of "Women is a Custom used by several nations in the East-Indies, as at Pegu [southern Myanmar], Siam, Cochinchina, and Cambodia. I did afterwards make a Voyage [to Tonkin, north Vietnam], and most of our Men had Women aboard all the time of our abode there.... It is accounted a piece of Policy to do it; for the chief Factors and Captains of Ships have the great men's Daughters offered them, the Mandarins or Noblemen at Tunquin."(11)
The custom of the temporary marriage could not have persisted for such a long time and so extensively in premodern Southeast Asian societies without the compliance, cooperation, and active involvement of the women concerned. It is dear that in places where foreigners were a rarity, considerable prestige accrued to those possessing a lover or husband from overseas. The women of Mindanao were thus "very desirous of the Company of Strangers, especially of White Men" and even the wives of nobility would look out of their windows when a stranger passed by, asking if he wanted a Pagally and sending servants "to invite him to their Friendship."(12) This anxiety to be seen as an associate of foreigners was consistent with a view common in premodern societies--of the outsider as imbued with sexual potency.(13) Perceived wealth was certainly a factor in the popularity of foreigners, but even more important was their status as "stranger-kings" in a region where sexual union between local women and men from overseas forms a dominant theme in indigenous legends. "The very poorest and meanest of us," wrote Dampier, "could hardly pass the Streets, but we were even hal'd by Force into their houses to be treated by them: altho' their Treats were but mean, [with] Tobacco, Betel-Nut, or a little sweet spiced Water."(14)
Dampier also makes frequent reference to the gifts local families expected in return for the hospitality they extended. "Our Men were generous enough, and would bestow half an Ounce of Gold at a time, in a Ring for their Pagallies, or in a silver Wrist-band, or Hoop to come about their Arms, in hopes to get a Night's lodging with them."(15) Basic to most Southeast Asian cultures was the belief that access to a woman's body was part of a reciprocal process in which the exchange of gifts was critical. In Burma, for example, gifts from a man to an unmarried woman were regarded as the prelude to sexual intercourse and legally belonged to her if the act occurred. The idea that a woman should be rewarded for sexual intimacy is well illustrated in a later Spanish account describing how promises of jewels and slaves were used to "persuade" a young Filipino bride to enter the wedding chamber each time she made the obligatory signs of hesitation.(16) This accumulation of gifts was a customary means of enabling a woman to increase her resources. According to a fourteenth-century law code from northern Siam, it was quite acceptable for a husband or parents to "have [a woman] go and live with another man in order to get money and goods from him, with a limit on the period."(17) By receiving valuable or unusual gifts from foreign traders, women and their families acquired prestige items that could be displayed or exchanged, significantly enhancing their status within the community. Money was certainly among the important gifts that could be offered, but in societies such as Mindanao, where barter was still common, coins were not seen as substantially different from jewelry, clothing, or other items. In the context of foreign trade, locals invested all items with the mana that came from outside.
Temporary marriages were indispensable to successful trading, not merely due to the kinship connections they created but because throughout Southeast Asia it was women, not men, who controlled the retail trade. A relationship with a foreign merchant gave a woman a clear advantage in access to desired goods either as sole seller or as agent. But as Alexander Hamilton, an experienced trader, explained in his account of Pegu and Siam, a relationship with a local woman was highly beneficial to European men as well.
[Local women] prove obedient and obliging Wives and take the
Management of Affairs within Doors wholly in their own hands.
She goes to Market for Food and acts the Cook in the Dressing of [her
husband's] Victuals, takes Care of his clothes, in washing and mending
them: if their Husbands have any Goods to sell, they set up a Shop
and sell them by retail, to a much better Account than they could be
sold for by Wholesale, and some of them carry a cargo of goods to the
inland Towns, and barter or Goods proper for the foreign markets that
their Husbands are bound to, and generally bring fair Accounts of
their Negotiations.(18)
Critical in the success of the temporary marriage was the assumption that both husband and wife would display the same mutual fidelity and respect that should accompany a more permanent union. Locals expected foreign traders to comply with existing norms. The proximity of a woman's relatives acted as a safeguard to ensure that her marital rights were honored and that she was not ill- treated; in the words of a northern Thai law, parents would be "distressed" should their daughter be beaten.(19) Adultery was regarded as the most heinous of crimes and should a foreigner transgress, one Dutchman warned, "he will be in grave trouble with his wife." Female anger was not to be taken lightly, since women were in charge of food preparation and "they are well versed in the Art of poisoning."(20)
By contrast, if both parties agreed, the dissolution of a temporary marriage was a relatively casual matter. Hamilton described the situation in Pegu and Siam: "If a Husband is content to continue the Marriage, whilst he goes to foreign Countries about his Affairs, he must leave some Fund to pay her about six Shillings eight Pence per Month, otherwise at the Year's End she may marry again, but if that Sum is paid her on his Account, she is obliged to stay the Term of three Years."(21) Unlike Asian traders, who returned at regular intervals, a European was more likely to leave permanently, but it was accepted that if he failed to return after a reasonable time his wife was free to remarry. The prospect of being left with children to rear was not a cause for alarm in most Southeast Asian communities, where the commercial world provided many opportunities for individuals who were seen as links between cultures. In the first stages of interaction with Europeans, indigenous elites assumed that children would provide valuable family links with foreign traders. Hamilton noted that Vietnamese nobles had previously "thought it no Shame or Disgrace to marry their daughters to English and Dutch Seamen, for the Tune they were to stay in Tonquin, and often presented their Son in Law pretty handsomely at their departure, especially if they left their Wives with Child."(22)
For local women, the departure of a foreign husband could thus mean social advancement rather than the stigma of being an abandoned wife. "When [a trader] wants to depart he gives whatever is promised, and so they leave each other in friendship and she may then look for another man as she wishes in all propriety, without scandal."(23) Indeed, her chances of negotiating an advantageous match were enhanced, for she had probably increased her economic resources and was assumed to possess new knowledge as a result of her association with a European. Far from being condemned as "loose" or amoral, a woman who had been passed from one European to another was in her own society "rather the better lookt on, that she has been married to several European husbands."(24)
Upper-Class Models
Hamilton's implication that Vietnam's ruler no longer encouraged sexual unions between high-ranking Vietnamese women and foreign men is significant. Indeed, by the early eighteenth century it is evident throughout Southeast Asia that the wives of foreigners were obtained overwhelmingly from outside elite circles. At lower social levels, the idea of temporary marriages with foreigners did not conflict with existing marital patterns, and though monogamous unions were the norm, the economic independence of females helped make divorce and remarriage common. At the higher echelons of society, this independence was far less evident. The purpose of upper-class marriages was to create new ties or cement old ones, and because these links were intended to be enduring, any dissolution was fraught with tension. As the numbers of foreign traders in the region grew, it became clear that most were not sufficiently influential to offer their new relatives lasting political or commercial benefits. From the point of view of well-born families, the advantages of arranging short-lived unions with such men were now questionable.
A further consideration was the restriction in elite circles on female sexual autonomy. In rural villages and among ordinary urban dwellers, premarital relations with an intended spouse were relatively common, but elite values placed- great stress on female virginity before the wedding and on a husband's exclusive rights thereafter. While providing visitors with female attendants as sexual partners remained "a customary act of politeness" in many noble courts, refined society also imposed controls over the sexuality of well-born women but not of their husbands.(25) The relative equality between the sexes common at the village level and the idea that a wife Was entitled to the sole sexual attentions of her husband had almost disappeared in elite society. Here, the superior status a man enjoyed by maintaining many women had become fundamental in gender relationships. While a king might have only one chief queen and two or three consorts, he could have many concubines and slave women, sometimes numbering in the hundreds or even thousands. In effect, a ruler supported as many women as he could afford. Indications of the distaste with which women regarded this situation frequently surface in the sources, but it was accepted as inextricably to upper-class male prestige. In elite circles, the double standard that praised chastity and sexual virtue in a woman but not a man was well in place, a significant factor in cultures where the ruler and his lifestyle were thought to represent the epitome of refinement and project a standard for the measurement of status.
Commoditizing Sex
The idea that the standing of high-ranking men was linked to the simultaneous possession of many women is critical in the process by which sex became a commodity in Southeast Asia. In Batavia, wealthy European men were quick to emulate local nobility, enhancing their status by increasing the ranks of their female servants and openly displaying the "goods" they had collected. An Englishman visiting Batavia in the late eighteenth century was told that the "harem" of a bachelor Dutch official comprised fifty slaves "assorted from the different nations of the East and combining every tinge of complexion from the sickly faded hue of a dried tobacco leaf to the shining polish of black marble."(26) Locally-born Christian wives of VOC employees, though often Eurasian and sometimes themselves former slaves, were anxious to assert their new standing and thus encouraged the acquisition of female domestics. According to one estimate, they normally required at least ten female slaves as personal attendants.(27)
For both Europeans and indigenous elite, maintenance of these large female establishments was expensive. An observer in seventeenth-century Banten (west Java) succinctly captures the problem. "The gentlemen of this land are brought to bee poor, by the number of slaves that they keepe, which eate faster than their pepper or rice groweth."(28) One way of ameliorating this situation was to employ female slaves not only as domestics and retainers, but also in occupations that yielded immediate profits. Slave women could then contribute to the household income by spinning and weaving, and by hawking such items as food or cloth in the streets or markets.(29) The sale of sex was quickly seen as another means by which slaves could help maintain a household critical to the status of their master and his wives or favored consorts. In late-sixteenth-century Brunei, female slaves "sold their bodies," paddling through the city waterways on small boats (perahu), singing and playing musical instruments, while calling out, "orang laki menbeli perempuan muda" ("Men, buy a young woman"). In Patani, too, nobles allowed their female slaves to solicit customers, as long as the profits were delivered to them.(30) In Ayutthaya, the capital of Siam, high-ranking women convicted of adultery were not put to death, as in many other places, but housed in a kind of brothel together with purchased slaves, with the head of the establishment paying a percentage of his profits to the ruler.(31) One can imagine there were many clients anxious to link themselves to the palace through sexual relations with a well-born woman, albeit a disgraced one.
Nonetheless, the sale of sex may not necessarily have been totally exploitative. In Brunei, for example, there were no set prices for sexual services and although the bulk of a woman's earnings would have been delivered to her owner, it would not have been difficult for her to hold back small items or money for her own use, given the relative freedom of slaves in Southeast Asian societies. Nor is it certain that all those involved were slaves, for the markets where women sold food, vegetables, and handicrafts were highly conducive to interaction between the sexes. There was, however, a clear understanding that a woman who had established a relationship with a man through marriage or temporary residence did not have the same sexual license as one who was unattached. The boundaries between the sexes imposed by marriage appeared in the physical arrangement of the market at Banten, where a special area was set aside for married women who had come to sell.(32)
A basic factor in the commercialization of sex was the increasing penetration of a monetized economy coupled with a heightened demand for female partners. From the sixteenth century onward, the major Southeast Asian ports witnessed a marked rise in the number of single male arrivals, especially Europeans, who brought their own perceptions of the short-term marriage. Even a sympathetic observer such as Alexander Hamilton saw this arrangement as a simple commercial contract. While he would have acknowledged there could be cases of genuine attraction, he saw the practice as an arrangement whereby the services of an efficient housekeeper, a knowledgeable trader, and a sexual partner were purchased for a set period of time.(33) Rather than establishing a cycle of gift giving, the financial transactions that framed the marriage absolved both parties from future responsibilities and obligations.
In societies where the use of coinage had become more widespread, sexual matters were already accorded monetary equivalencies; Javanese law codes laid down that men should make recompense to a woman they had sexually molested.(34) There was also recognition that casual sex with strangers, while certainly not desirable, was an acceptable way for the very poor to make a living as long as all parties agreed. A ruler in east Sumatra stressed that his concern to prevent Dutch men from "dishonoring" local females was not intended to stop consenting women from receiving payment for sexual services, since these must be considered a wage (loon).(35)
Nonetheless, the money that women received even for apparently casual sexual services remained in the realm of a gift, a prestige item that held out the promise of future favors and a continuing relationship. Europeans, on the other hand, tended to place money in an economic sphere where interactions were "inherently impersonal, transitory, amoral and calculating." They regarded money as an inappropriate gift for relationships considered personal or enduring. Sexual intercourse that was "bought" could not by definition represent true affection or commitment.(36) The idea that relations between men and women could be detached from social and cultural obligations placed enormous pressure on the sexual exchanges by which foreigners had been previously incorporated.
In assessing the effects of changing economic patterns on sexual relations, Dampier's comment on the lack of trade at Mindanao, endorsed by other observers, is therefore revealing. Here, a single crew of foreign men was a novelty, a small group that could be welcomed without undue difficulty into local society as temporary husbands. In areas where foreign traders were more numerous, absorption was far more problematic, and the status of the temporary wife consequently more difficult to safeguard. The women in Mindanao may have accepted gifts in return for sexual access, but this hardly can be termed prostitution. In other port cities of Southeast Asia, however, a flourishing trade in sex was already developing, with incoming traders and foreigners as the principal customers and low-ranking women or slaves as the suppliers.
Male Arrivals
The early modern period in Southeast Asia saw a growth of urban centers where foreign men were disproportionately represented. Whereas Chinese women rarely left their homeland, migration of Chinese men to Southeast Asia increased markedly after 1567, when the imperial court lifted its prohibitions against maritime travel. A modern scholar has described Spanish-ruled Manila in the seventeenth century as "indubitably" a Chinese town, and, she might have added, a male Chinese town at that. Between 1602 and 1636 the Chinese population rose from 2,000 to 25,000. Dutch-controlled Batavia was another magnet; in 1625 alone, five Chinese junks arrived, each carrying around four hundred men. By the 1730s, the Chinese community accounted for about 20 percent of Batavia's inhabitants, with the result that there were twice as many males as females.(37)
Lower-class Chinese men, the human cargo of the junk trade, came from communities where marriage was normally possible only through the payment of a bride-price, and the purchase of a wife was a familiar concept. More important, Chinese males who came to Southeast Asia found they could only operate effectively in commerce if they established connections with women, who dominated the peddling trade. Thus, while men of influence often acquired their women as gifts from rulers or nobles, ordinary men readily entered into arrangements with local females and their families. In 1694, a Chinese monk remarked of Hoi An, on the central Vietnamese coast, "`The women were very good at trade, so the traders [from Fujian, southeastern China] who came here all tended to marry a local woman to help them with their trading.'"(38)
The relationships that developed, however, were not without cultural dislocations. Chinese attitudes had long equated the relative freedom of "southern women" with sexual promiscuity, and Chinese men would have been unaccustomed to the independence fostered by female commercial skills and the customary privileges to which married women in Southeast Asia were entitled. An unhappy wife could easily return home, and the proximity of her kin acted as a safeguard against ill-treatment or neglect. Even in Vietnam, where Chinese-influenced law codes accorded females a lower status, the marital rights of women were acknowledged and they could look to their families for support. As one Frenchman put it: "`When a man marries [in Vietnam], he marries his master. His wife orders him about and the law shelters her from the man's mistreatment .... A woman who has been maltreated by a man lies down in front of the doorway or in the middle of the street and covers her face. Then her relatives congregate and go and fetch the mandarin.'"(39)
Many Chinese traders found it cheaper and less troublesome to buy one or two slaves rather than become involved with a wife and her relatives. By this means they could satisfy domestic, commercial, and sexual needs without the demands of a family, and a slave could be resold should she prove unsatisfactory. In early-seventeenth-century Banten, for example, Chinese men "bought women slaves by whom they have many children," acquiring progeny that was denied many poor men in China. When they left Banten, they could sell their wives and take any sons back to China to assume the position of heir.(40)
But because Chinese men rarely absorbed the cultural obligations between slaves and owners,(41) wives who were also slaves were in a much more precarious position than those who had negotiated their arrangement through a contract. Far from their families, they had not played a role in choosing their husbands, they were more likely to be in competition with other women for the favors of their masters, and, of course, they were unable to initiate a divorce. Furthermore, Chinese men never regarded them as wives. When the Dutch allowed the Balinese widow of the deceased Kapitan Cina, or Chinese headman, to represent Chinese interests in Batavia, the Chinese community was outraged. As a Chinese chronicler remarked, however virtuous, a former slave who was a "`simple concubine'" rather than an officially married wife could never have earned the respect of the Batavian Chinese.(42) Indeed, without the protection of family, purchased wives were frequently subjected to physical abuse. One Englishman in Banten, describing the pitiable position of a slave-wife from southern Vietnam who had fled from her Chinese husband, observed that it was "`an ordinary thing for the Chinese to beat their wives, especially she being a Cochinchyne woman, which had no friends [i.e., relatives] in towne, for the Javans will hardly suffer them to beat their women.'"(43)
The arrival of large numbers of Europeans also affected attitudes toward short-term unions. While Europeans were far less numerous than Chinese, they were disproportionately represented in the commercial centers under European control, notably Batavia, Manila, Makassar, and Melaka. Like Chinese, Europeans were almost solely male, and arrived without women, though many were married. A large percentage of the Spanish soldiers who came to the Philippines had left their wives in Spain fifteen or twenty years before, and, while encouraged, the reunion of couples was not easily accomplished. Among the Dutch, only employees above the rank of merchant (koopman) were permitted to bring their families with them to the Indies.(44) Without access to women from their own cultures, and often without the means or desire to set themselves up domestically, common soldiers, traders, and low officials were usually willing to enter into brief, cheap, and uncomplicated sexual liaisons. For them, the gift-for-sex exchange was simple prostitution. In a compelling example of cultural misreading, the apparent willingness of Southeast Asian females to "sell themselves for any gain, however slight" and to accept articles that foreigners considered trinkets in return for sexual access confirmed the European view that these women were "promiscuous."(45)
This perception of Southeast Asian females as wanton was fed by racial stereotypes regarding the sexual propensities of Asian women, as well as by contemporary European notions about the influence of climate on behavior. It was believed that European men in the tropics faced extraordinary temptations, not only because the heat undermined their ability to curb sensual desires, but also because Southeast Asian women were "lascivious" and "given to love."(46) Repeatedly, Europeans cited evidence of what they considered ingrained promiscuity of Southeast Asian females, such as the allegedly provocative manner in which they dressed. The loose sarong Burmese women wore, for example, often parted to show a "pretty leg and a plump thigh"; other accounts noted that local costume seemed designed to leave "a great deal of the bosom exposed." The dancing featured during most celebrations was also viewed as flaunting the body.(47) Frequent and public bathing was seemingly further indication of moral laxity. Europeans came from societies where public baths had been outlawed because they were associated with immorality.(48) and they found fascinating a custom they linked with sexual permissiveness. Like Chinese, Europeans were ignorant of the strict codes that governed bathing practices. The fact that it was so widespread through the region reinforced Europeans' opinion that Southeast Asian women, though beautiful, were immodest and did not prize chastity.(49)
The European view that Southeast Asian societies did not observe moral laws fostered a general attitude that rape and abduction were permissible. Long after the Portuguese lost control of Melaka in 1641, stories circulated about the way in which they "made use of the Native Women at their Pleasure, whether Virgins or married Women such as they liked they took without Controul."(50) Spanish priests in the late sixteenth century recorded similar accounts of behavior of Spaniards in the Philippines, where pregnant women were beaten and the wives and daughters of chiefs seized. "Mere is no way,'" wrote one friar, "`to describe [Spanish treatment of local females] without offending your Majesty's ears.'"(51) The Dutch and English were not much better. The head of the VOC post of Jambi (east coast Sumatra), for example, took a local married woman as a concubine and made her pregnant, but she died in childbirth and the baby was stillborn. According to customary law, her husband was entitled to seek vengeance or receive compensation, but the Dutch head forbade him to come anywhere in the vicinity of the VOC post.(52)
From Wife to Concubine
Despite official exhortations, European men encountered clear obstacles to marriage, the most obvious being the lack of European and local Christian women. It is thus not surprising that frequently lower-ranking Europeans adopted what indigenous society initially viewed as a continuation of the temporary marriage concept but which Europeans recategorized and demoted to concubinage. In Ayutthaya, VOC officials who lived with women to whom they were not married defended themselves against accusations of immorality by arguing that they "`did not posses [sic] the gift of abstinence, and had no women of their own kind.'"(53) If they were not to resort to patronage of common whores, the VOC should permit them to live with concubines.
It became increasingly apparent to local communities, however, that Europeans considered concubinage--cohabitation without a legal document and Church approval--not as a temporary marriage but as an irregular and sinful relationship. During the late seventeenth century, the Queen Regent of Spain advocated stem measures against Filipino women "who live in concubinage" since this was considered "scandalous behavior."(54) The view that concubines were promiscuous was fostered by the rapidity with which they took on a new husband when their previous one departed or died. Indeed, VOC employees in Ayutthaya even referred to their "wives" as "whores, sluts and trollops and the like, up to and including the director."(55)
Other problems arose between local societies and European administrations as a result of sexual relations between foreign men and nonelite women. There were frequent disputes, for instance, regarding jurisdiction over children; the VOC wanted the children of Dutch fathers to be taken to Batavia and raised as Christians, while local custom dictated they should stay with their mothers. In Ayutthaya, the ruler issued an edict in 1657 forbidding Thais to marry foreigners.(56) The flagrant promiscuity associated with many European posts and total absence of sexual fidelity, a cornerstone of the temporary marriage concept, also undermined the standing of women who chose to cohabit with foreigners even if they did gain material benefits. Increasingly, these women tended to be not only lower class but from groups that were culturally marginal and economically deprived. Such liaisons were expected because European men who lived in cities and outlying trading posts mixed not with village women and their families but with females who were far from home--slaves, ex-slaves, and outsiders. It was not unusual for the sexual partners of Dutch employees in Ayutthaya to be ethnically Mon, like the trader "Jau Soet" who enjoyed liaisons of varying lengths with a number of VOC officials, including the leaders of the VOC lodge.(57)
Without the security of a marriage document, the position of a concubine was always precarious. Some Europeans, like Chinese, preferred slaves rather than free women for domestic duties and sexual pleasure, since they were far easier to control and represented a disposable asset. Impoverished English factors in early-seventeenth-century Sukadana (west Borneo), for example, sold their "whores" to buy food.(58) Financial considerations weighed heavily when European males considered how their sexual needs were to be satisfied. Whereas poor but free women saw such relationships as an opportunity to improve their economic position, European men increasingly came to believe that marriage or even concubinage with a local woman could lead to financial ruin. Thus, if a man's aim was to obtain a housekeeper, a cook, and a partner in bed, it was easier to purchase a slave or slaves to whom he owed no responsibilities and who could be resold if she were unsatisfactory, if he decided to leave, or if his resources were stretched.
Concubines, Slaves, and Prostitution
The European tendency to group concubines with slaves and prostitutes had a significant influence on perceptions of the temporary wife because in Europe prostitution was regarded a crime.(59) In Southeast Asia, tightening social controls over female sexuality was intimately associated with the spread of world religions, but records from various European administrations also provide evidence of their concern to eliminate "immorality." For the first time, the state established institutions specifically for "loose women." In 1674, the College of Santa Pontenciana in Manila was set aside to house "lewd women" whom magistrates placed there. Kept apart from orphans and women in distress, "lewd women" were "maintained by the king and they are to work for him."(60) In Batavia and such other Dutch-controlled centers as Melaka, "debauched women" were confined in a building known as the "spin house" where they were "reclaimed ... from their ill course of life" by being kept continually at work "under the tuition of a governess" and scourged when necessary.(61)
The increased visibility of prostitution in historical records is not just a product of European preoccupations. A feature of this period is the growing indebtedness of ordinary Southeast Asians as economies became increasingly monetized. Among nonelite groups, for whom premarital chastity was not a great concern, prostitution presented one solution to economic hardship since then as now it was customary to channel to the family resources earned in this manner.(62) Should a family be particularly pressed, daughters could be mortgaged as debt-slaves--domestic servants who were also available for sex. In eighteenth-century Vietnam, which saw continued warfare and consequent disruption to agriculture, mothers often helped negotiate sexual liaisons for their daughters. "`Young women,'" noted one observer, "`dispose of personal favours to procure articles of the first necessity for themselves and their families.... Neither the husband nor the father seems to have any scruples in abandoning the wife or the daughter to the gallant.'"(63) Indigenous rulers were clearly concerned at this trend. In Vietnam, the Le Code forbade prostitution for girls under age fifteen, and in late-seventeenth-century Burma the ruler even issued edicts forbidding parents from selling their children. One hundred years later, however, prostitutes in Rangoon often were girls who had been mortgaged for their fathers' debts and subsequently sold by creditors.(64)
The relationship between prostitution and increasing poverty was very evident in the growing urban centers.(65) Cities have always been linked with a commoditization of sex, and the contrast with village life was sufficiently marked in the Philippines for one Spanish friar to contend that "`prostitution does not exist in the heathen villages.'"(66) As we have seen, a principal reason for a rise in commercial sex in the cities was the surplus of males, many of whom were single and transient. Europeans employed as soldiers, sailors, and clerks were ill paid, and city administrations saw cohabitation without a legal marriage as a punishable offense. A second factor was the preponderance of slaves in Southeast Asian cities, and the expectation that their activities should yield profit for their owners. By 1730, for example, 71 percent of the inhabitants of Makassar were slaves, whose earnings provided an income for their commonly mestizo owners.(67) The figures are even more striking in Batavia, where as many as 10,000 slaves were brought between 1661 and 1682. In 1679, slaves comprised 59 percent of the residents in the inner city; by 1749, this figure had risen slightly to 61 percent. Overall, male slaves outnumbered females, but freed females tended to remain in Batavia, so that an overwhelming number of former slaves (mardijkers) were women.(68) A third reason was the increase in unattached individuals--refugees, wandering mercenaries, and abandoned women and children--who lacked any clear basis of support. The erosion of the conventions and financial guarantees governing temporary marriages, departure of European fathers, and closing of European posts also contributed to a growing number of mixed-birth residents who no longer enjoyed the status of cultural brokers and were largely left to fend for themselves.(69)
Among this floating mass of uprooted people was a steadily rising number of poor women, in large measure due to the manumission of slaves freed through conversion to Christianity or in the wills of deceased owners. These females did not possess the resources or skills that could easily generate income, and petty trading or domestic service combined with sexual availability was sometimes the only way to make a living. The fear of further poverty acted as goad to the sale of sex, for in European cities indebtedness could be a punishable offense. In 1674, for example, six Melaka women were incarcerated in a VOC jail because of their debts.(70) Dutch records from Batavia show that it was relatively common for a domestic concubine/servant to wash, sell, clean, and provide sexual services privately and/or publicly because her master had agreed to pay her debts. An individual who could command the sexual services of several women could draw considerable profits. A typical case reported in 1643 from Banda in eastern Indonesia concerns a mestizo who kept a number of female slaves as prostitutes, earning from each about half or three-eighths of a real per day at a time when the standard wage for physical labor in much of the archipelago was a quarter of a real. In 1644, one minister complained that female slaves in Batavia were maintained "`merely to deliver the earnings obtained from their bodies.'" To avoid trouble with the law, women sent out to solicit were often given a few pieces of cheap cloth so they could claim they were peddlers.(71)
Batavia, with its "large and increasing surplus of male inhabitants" provides a telling example of how cities, where so many people were recent arrivals living in penury with no kin support, created the kind of environment in which commercialized sex thrives. The VOC fort and the lodges in the outlying posts became foci for the sale of sexual services, both by women working independently and those who delivered their earnings to others. Brothels, sometimes operated by agents of VOC officials, sprang up outside city walls and around the fort because of the ruling that soldiers could not bring women into the barracks.(72) The district known as the "Oostervoorstad" was inhabited largely by former slaves and their offspring, with a preponderance of poor females; in 1686, for example, there were 1,131 males here, and 1,823 women. Poverty and domestic abuse thrust many into prostitution, and this district gained a reputation as an area where sexual favors could be bought easily. To a lesser extent, the same pattern is discernible in other Southeast Asian cities. One area in the town of Maindu, opposite Rangoon, was inhabited completely by prostitutes.(73) In these urban enclaves, the taverns and arak (rice wine) houses were often owned by local women and acted as gathering points for those selling or purchasing sex.(74) Popular street entertainment, another means by which poor and unskilled women could earn an income, was similarly linked with prostitution. As the English scholar-administrator Stamford Raffles remarked, "The common dancing girls of the country... are called ronggeng, and are generally of easy virtue ... as to render the title of ronggeng and prostitute synonymous."(75)
Trade in sex also opened opportunities for poor women, ordinarily freed but aging slaves who lacked family support and economic resources. Because older females traditionally had participated as mediators in marriage negotiations, they easily took on the role of procurers. A light-hearted Malay poem of the period tells of a widow from Bali, "`the sweet old lady with the bold mouth / highly skilled in the art of deceit'" who helped a Portuguese trader abduct the concubine of a Chinese.(76) The depiction of such women in VOC sources is less appealing. Nyai Assan, for example, was well-known to the Batavia authorities for her collaboration with incoming ship captains. Her methods were simple; she befriended lowborn women, lured them out to the harbor for a pleasure trip, and fed them drugged refreshments. They were then handed over to captains sailing to outlying ports.(77)
Targets for this kind of abduction were usually slaves or former slaves. Once a woman had been enslaved, she was regarded as available to any man who could assert his social or physical control over her. Indeed, in Dutch sources the terms "slavinne" (female slave) and "hoor" (whore) are frequently used interchangeably. Although indigenous society was not always kind to female slaves and bondswomen, there were accepted traditions that governed behavior between master and servant and provided for recompense in the case of abuse. In the heightened commercial climate of the early modern period, these traditional restraints often were ignored with impunity, especially by those in high places. A case from Jambi illustrates that women frequently were driven to take desperate measures. A female slave belonging to a leading court figure earned money for him by prostitution. One day she appeared in the VOC lodge, claiming she was a free woman and that her mother was upriver. She asked the mestizo supervisor of the VOC slaves if she could live in his household until her mother returned. Her attempt to present herself as an "honorable" woman apparently failed, for according to her own account, the supervisor sexually abused her. Further, when he discovered her origins, she was evicted to avoid disputes with her owner. Without any income, and surrounded by potential customers within the relatively safe walls of the Dutch compound, it is hardly surprising that this unnamed woman hid "in nooks and crannies" to prostitute herself "both night and day" with VOC employees and their slaves. Condemned as an immoral and corrupting runaway, she was further victimized when a group of Javanese men abducted her.(78) In another case from Jambi, a female slave avenged herself on her owner, a Dutch soldier who had kept her in neck-chains for five months, by arranging for a Javanese man to murder him.(79)
Conclusion
By the end of the eighteenth century, the temporary wife had not disappeared from the Southeast Asian scene, but the respect she once enjoyed had slipped away. The Dutch description of the horrific treatment meted out to "Encik Koey's widow" encodes many of the changes in attitudes toward sexuality that typify the early modern period. In contrast to the temporary wife of the past and privileged Eurasian wives of colonial employees, the concubine of a foreign trader was increasingly likely to be a lowborn and marginal person, accepted neither by her husband's associates nor by local society.(80) The future of children born of such unions was also insecure. Among Europeans and indigenous courts alike there was a growing suspicion of the "half-caste," who had in the past been able to reach positions of influence and importance, and in some places religious teachings promoting female seclusion had led to prohibitions against marriages with foreigners. Though well into the nineteenth century Europeans continued to take concubines, the tendency to see concubines akin to prostitutes meant that the standing of the temporary wife had been fundamentally eroded
Southeast Asia provides an intriguing example of the processes behind shifts in sexual attitudes. When Europeans arrived in the region, it was widely accepted that a foreign trader could establish a sexual relationship with a local woman who would act as his wife and economic partner for as long as required. Newly arrived males gained access to sexual companionship, household help, and assistance in economic activities; their wives were entitled to marital rights, while acquiring financial benefits and enhancing their status and that of their families. During the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, the commercialization of these relationships and the debasement of temporary wives to concubines entailed a loss of autonomy and a less assured position because so often foreigners took slaves and ex-slaves as wives. Expected to contribute to their master's income, such a woman frequently chose or was forced to sell sex, and expanding urban centers with substantial male populations provided willing clients. This growing trade in sex was highly significant in an environment where upper-class values presented a woman's chastity and fidelity to one man as the ideal of female behavior, while a man's sexual experience with many women was regarded as a demonstration of masculinity.
In the Western world, and in some Asian cultures, the sale of sex has very old roots. In Africa, the Americas, and Southeast Asia, however, it is associated with a more recent spectrum of changes--the spread of world religions, rise of patriarchal states, increased foreign presence, coin currencies, and emergence of towns--which all transformed local societies.(81) Modern research on sexual attitudes in Southeast Asia has focused primarily on prostitution, but behind the grim realities linking poverty and the contemporary sex trade it is possible to discern other historical continuities. Still today, the great hope of many prostitutes in Jakarta is to attach themselves to a wealthy expatriate, to become his isteri kontrak, or wife, for the period of his company contract.(82) In so doing, they may be able to step beyond the shadow of "Encik Koey's widow" and regain a little of the economic security and social acceptance once associated with the temporary wife.
NOTES
(1) This article is a revised version of a paper originally presented to the 14th International Association of Historians of Asia Conference, Bangkok, 20-24 May 1996. For arguments supporting the term "early modern," see Anthony Reid, "Introduction: A Time and Place," in Southeast Asia in the Early Modern Era: Trade, Power and Belief, ed. Anthony Reid (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1993).
(2) Verengide Oost-Indische Compagnie (VOC).
(3) Algemeen Rijksarchief, The Hague, VOC 1283, Palembang to Batavia, 2 March 1671, 1551. The VOC documents used in this article are housed at the General State Archives in The Hague, the Netherlands. The incoming and outgoing letters from Batavia to Amsterdam and between Batavia and other posts are bound in volumes, each of which usually covers a year. These volumes have all been assigned reference numbers. In this case, for example, VOC 1283 includes letters to and from Batavia and other posts in the Indonesian archipelago for the year 1671.
(4) Anthony Reid, Southeast Asia in the Age of Commerce 1450-1680, vol. 1, The Lands below the Winds (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1988), 6, 146, 162. Some examples of historical works on prostitution are John Ingleson, "Prostitution in Colonial Java," in Nineteenth and Twentieth Century Indonesia, ed. David P. Chandler and M. C. Ricklefs (Clayton, Victoria: Centre of Southeast Asian Studies, Monash University, 1986), 123-40; Alison Murray, No Money, No Honey: A Study 4 Street Traders and Prostitutes in Jakarta (Singapore: Oxford University Press, 1991); Luis C. Dery, "Prostitution in Colonial Manila," Philippine Studies 39, no. 9 (1991): 475-89; and James Francis Warren, Ah-Ku and Karayuki-san: Prostitution in Singapore 1870-1940 (Singapore: Oxford University Press, 1993).
(5) I have discussed these ideas more fully in Barbara Watson Andaya, To Live as Brothers: Southeast Sumatra in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries (Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press, 1993), 21-29, 40-41. Of course, this arrangement is not unique to Southeast Asia.
(6) The derivation of the word "Pagally" is unclear, but Professor Michael Forman (Department of Linguistics, University of Hawai'i) has suggested that it may derive from a Mindanao dialect, meaning brother or sister.
(7) William, Dampier, A New Voyage around the World, ed. Albert Gray (1697; reprint, London: Argonaut Press, 1927; reprint, New York: Dover Publications, 1968), 224.
(8) Ibid., 248.
(9) Ma Huan, Ying-yai Sheng-lan: The Overall Survey of the Ocean's Shores [1433], trans. and ed. J. V. G. Mills (Cambridge, England: Hakluyt Society, 1970), 104.
(10) E. H. Blair and J. A. Robertson, eds., The Philippine Islands, 1493-1898 (Cleveland, Ohio: Arthur H. Clark, 1903-9), 2:138.
(11) Dampier, A New Voyage, 269; Reid, Southeast Asia in the Age of Commerce, 1: 155.
(12) Dampier, A New Voyage, 244.
(13) Marshall Sahlins, "The Stranger-King: or Dumezil among the Fijians," in Islands of History (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1985), 79.
(14) Dampier, A New Voyage, 244.
(15) Ibid., quote on 249, 244.
(16) E. Forchhammer, trans. and ed., King Wagaru's Manu Dhammasattham (Rangoon: Government Printing, 1893), 12; and Blair and Robertson, eds., The Philippine Islands, 5: 187.
(17) Aroonrut Wichienkeco and Gehan Wijeyewardene, trans. and eds., The Laws of King Mangrai (Canberra: Research School of Pacific Studies, Australian National University, 1986), 73.
(18) Alexander Hamilton, A New Account of the East Indies (1727; reprint, London: Argonaut Press, 1930), 2: quote on 28, 96.
(19) Wichienkeco and Wijeyewardene, trans. and eds., The Laws offing Mangrai, 40-44.
(20) H. A. van Foreest and A. de Booy, eds., De Vierde Schipvaart der Nederlanders naar Oost-Indie onder Jacob Wilkens en Jacob van Neck (1599-1604) (The Hague: Linschoten Vereeniging, 1980), 223; and Hamilton, A New Account, 2: 115.
(21) Hamilton, A New Account, 2: quote on 28, 96.
(22) Van Foreest and De Booy, eds., De Vierde Schipvaart, 38; and Hamilton, A New Account, 2:115.
(23) Van Foreest and De Booy, eds., De Vierde Schipvaart, 223.
(24) Hamilton, A New Account, 2. quote on 28,96. See also p. 96 where Hamilton makes similar remarks when describing Siam. "It is thought no Disgrace to have had many temporary husbands, but rather an Honour that they have been beloved by so many different Men."
(25) Li Tana and Anthony Reid, Southern Vietnam under the Nguyen: Documents on the Economic History of Cochin (Dang Trong), 1602-1777 (Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies/Economic History of Southeast Asia Project, 1993), quote on 77. See also Dampier, A New Voyage, 263; and Pierre-Yves Manguin, Les Nguyen, Macau et Portugal (Paris: Ecole Francais d'Extreme Orient, 1984), 25.
(26) John Barrow, A Voyage to Cochinchina in the Years 1792 and 1793 (1806; reprint, Kuala Lumpur: Oxford University Press, 1975), 206.
(27) Samuel Purchas, ed., Purchas His Pilgrimes (Glasgow: James Maclehose and Sons, 1905), 3: 440.
(28) Ibid.
(29) Blair and Robertson, eds., The Philippine Islands, 5: 145; and G. P. Rouffaer and J. W. Ijzerman, De Eerste Schipvaart der Nederlanders naar Oost-Indie onder Cornelis de Houtman 1595-1597 (The Hague: Linschoten Vereeniging, 1915-21), 1: 129.
(30) For Brunei quote, see John S. Carroll, "Berunai in the Boxer Codex," Journal of the Malaysian Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society (hereafter cited as JMBRAS) 55, no. 2 (1982): 14. For Patani, see Van Foreest and De Booy, eds., De Vierde Schipvaart, 225.
(31) Simon de la Loubere, The Kingdom of Siam, ed. David K. Wyatt (Kuala Lumpur: Oxford University Press, 1969), 74, 85.
(32) Rouffaer and Ijzerman, De Eerste Schipvaart, 112, ill. facing 110. The latter also shows an area where "traders and adventurers strolled," which would have provided a meeting ground for the sale and purchase of sexual access. A good example of the growing role of the outdoor market as a center for the sex trade is provided in accounts of seventeenth-century Vietnam. See Micheline Lessard, "Curious Relations: Jesuit Perceptions of the Vietnamese," in Essays into Vietnamese Pasts, ed. K. W. Taylor and John K. Whitmore (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell Southeast Asia Program, 1995), 149; and Liam Kelley, "Vietnam through the Eyes of a Chinese Abbot: Dashan's Haiwai Jishi (1694-95)" (master's thesis, University of Hawai'i, 1996), 54.
(33) Hamilton, A New Account, 2: 280.
(34) Mason Hoadley and M. B. Hooker, An Introduction to Javanese Law: A Translation and Commentary on the Agama, Association for Asian Studies, monograph no. 37 (Tucson: University of Arizona Press, 1982), 203.
(35) VOC 1249, Jan van Wesenhage's report on Inderagiri, 13 January 1665, 68.
(36) J. Parry and M. Bloch, "Introduction," in Money and the Morality of Exchange, ed. J. Parry and M. Bloch (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989), 9.
(37) Christine Dobbin, Asian Entrepreneurial Minorities: Conjoint Communities in the Making of the World Economy, 1570-1940, Nordic Institute of Asian Studies, monograph no. 71 (Richmond, Surrey: Curzon, 1996), 22. For the Manila figures, see Nicholas Cushner, Spain in the Philippines: From Conquest to Revolution (Quezon City: Ateneo de Manila University, 1971), 161. For Batavia, see Leonard Blusse, Strange Company: Chinese Settlers, mestizo women, and the Dutch in VOC Batavia, Verhandelingen van het Koninklijk Instituut voor Taal-, Land en Volkenkunde, no. 122 (Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Foris Publications, 1986), esp. 73-96; and Remco Raben, "Batavia and Colombo: The Ethnic and Spatial Order of Two Colonial Cities, 1600-1800" (Ph.D. diss., University of Leiden, 1995), 95.
(38) Li and Reid, Southern Vietnam under the Nguyen, 58.
(39) Ibid., 74.
(40) Purchas, Purchas His Pilgrimes, 2: 446.
(41) Anthony Reid, "Introduction," in Slavery, Bondage, and Dependency, ed. Anthony Reid (New York: St. Martin's Press, 1983), 24. 42 Raben, "Batavia and Colombo," 142.
(43) Purchas, Purchas His Pilgrimes, 2, quote on 471; and Blusse, Strange Company, 168.
(44) Blair and Robertson, eds., The Philippine Islands, 5:246; and Blusse, Strange Company, 163.
(45) Blair and Robertson, eds., The Philippine Islands, 2: quote on 138. For similar comments in Vietnam, see Li and Reid, Southern Vietnam under the Nguyen, 77. For the region generally, see Marijke Barend-van Haeften, Oost-Indie Gespiegeld. Nicolaas de Graaff, een schrijvend chirugijn in dienst van de VOC (Zutphen: Walburg Press, 1992), 143.
(46) Reid, Southeast Asia in the Age of Commerce, 1: 153.
(47) Hamilton, A New Account, 2: quote on 27; Th. Salmon, Hedendaagsche Historie of Tegenwoordige Staat can alle Volkeren (Amsterdam: Issak Tirion, 1739), 3: 165. For similar comments, see W. Schouten, Reistogt naar en door Oost-Indien (Utrecht: J. J. van Poolsum, et al., 1775), 3: 41; Hubert Jacobs, ed. and trans., A Treatise on the Moll, (ca. 1544) Probably the Preliminary Version of Antonio Galvao's Lost Historia das Molucas (Rome: Jesuit Historical Institute, 1970), 89; Li and Reid, Southern Vietnam under the Nguyen, 79; and Barrow, A Voyage to Cochinchina, 224.
(48) Merry E. Wiesner, "Spinning Out Capital: Women's Work in the Early Modern Economy," in Becoming Visible: Women in European History, ed. Renate Bridenthal, Claudia Koonz, and Susan Stuard (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1987), 243.
(49) Edward H. Schafer, The Vermilion Bird: T'ang Images of the South (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1967), 80; Blair and Robertson, eds., The Philippine Islands, 97-98; and Dampier, A New Voyage, 226.
(50) William Dampier, Voyages and Discoveries, ed. C. Wilkinson (London: Argonaut Press, 1931), quote on 111; and Leonard Y. Andaya, The World of Maluku: Eastern Indonesia in the Early Modern Period (Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press, 1993), 121.
(51) Blair and Robertson, eds., The Philippine Islands, 5: 225.
(52) VOC 1961, Jambi to Batavia, 22 February 1721, fol. 3.
(53) "Derde Voyage van Gijsbert Heecq Naer Cost Indijen," S. P. L'Honore Naber, ed., Marineblad 25 (1910-1911): 442, cited in Han ten Brummelhuis, Merchant, Courtier and Diplomat: A History of the Contacts between the Netherlands and Thailand (Lochem-Gent: De Tijdstroom, 1987), 60.
(54) Fr. Ruperto C. Santos, ed., Anales Ecclesiasticos de Philipinas, 1574-1682: Philippine Church History (Manila: Roman Catholic Archbishop, 1994), 2: quote on 73, 76, 78.
(55) Ten Brummelhuis, Merchant, Courtier and Diplomat, 60.
(56) Hamilton, A New Account, 2: 115; and George Vinal Smith, "The Dutch East India Company and the Kingdom of Ayutthaya, 1604-1694" (Ph.D. diss., Northern Illinois University, 1974), 285-87.
(57) Dhiravat na Pombejra, Court, Company, and Campong: Essays on the VOC Presence in Ayutthaya, occasional paper no. 1 (Ayutthaya: Ayutthaya Historical Study Centre, 1992), 10.
(58) Reid, Southeast Asia in the Age of Commerce, 1: 156.
(59) Merry Wiesner, Women and Gender in Early Modern Europe (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993), 101. On Christian attitudes, see Vern Bullough and Bonnie Bullough, Women and Prostitution: A Social History (Buffalo, N.Y.: Prometheus Books, 1987), 62-71.
(60) C. R. Boxer, Mary and Misogyny. Women in Iberian Experience Overseas, 1415-1815 (London: Gerald Duckworth and Co., 1975), quote on 92. Santos, Anales Ecclesiasticos de Philipinas, 2: 73, 76, 78.
(61) Johan Nieuhof, Voyages and Travels to the East Indies, 1653-1670 (1704; reprint, Singapore: Oxford University Press, 1988), quote on 268. For further reference to houses of correction, see F. de Haan, Oud Batavia (Batavia: Kolff, 1922), 1: 293; and M. J. Bremner, trans., "Report of Governor Balthasar Bort on Malacca," JMBRAS 5, no. 1 (1927): 94.
(62) Richard Symanski, The Immoral Landscape. Female Prostitution in Western Societies (Toronto: Butterworths, 1981), 273. Murray (No Money, No Honey, 108) mentions that in contemporary times one prostitute may be able to support around eighteen relatives.
(63) Barrow, A Voyage to Cochinchina, quote on 305; Blair and Robertson, eds., The Philippine Islands, 5: 119; Daniel Beeckman, A Voyage to and from the Island of Borneo (1718; reprint, London: Dawsons, 1973), 42; and Li and Reid, Southern Vietnam under the Nguyen, 77.
(64) Ta Van Tai, "The Status of Women in Traditional Vietnam: A Comparison of the Code of the Le Dynasty (1428-1788) with the Chinese Codes," Journal of Asian History 15, no. 2 (1981): 116; Than Tun, trans. and ed., Royal Orders of Burma, A.D. 1598-1885 (Kyoto: Center for Southeast Asian Studies, University of Kyoto, 1986), 2:28; and Michael Symes, An Account of an Embassy to the Kingdom of Ava in the Year 1795 (Edinburgh: Constable and Co., 1827), 1: 252.
(65) Reid, Southeast Asia in the Age of Commerce, 2: 62-131.
(66) "Cited in Mary John Mananzan, "The Filipino Woman: Before and after the Spanish Conquest of the Philippines," in Essays on Women (Manila: St. Scholastica's College, 1987), 12.
(67) H. Sutherland, "Slavery and the Slave Trade in South Sulawesi, 1660s-1800s," in Reid, ed., Slavery, Bondage, and Dependency, 269.
(68) Figures cited are in Henk Niemeyer, "Calvinisme en koloniale stadscultuur: Batavia 1619-1725" (Ph.D. diss., Free University, 1996), 51-54, which is a rich source for this period. See also Raben, "Batavia and Colombo," Appendix III.
(69) De Haan, Oud Batavia, 1:542; Hamilton, A New Account, 2:96; Barrow, A Voyage to Cochinchina, 238; and ten Brummelhuis, Merchant, Courier and Diplomat, 5860.
(70) Bremner, trans., "Report of Governor Balthasar Bort," 94.
(71) Niemeyer, "Calvinisme en koloniale stadscultuur," quote on 260; and Blusse, Strange Company, 168.
(72) Raben, "Batavia and Columbo," 110; Niemeyer, "Calvinisme en koloniale stadscultuur," 260; and Blusse, Strange Company, 169.
(73) Niemeyer, "Calvinisme en koloniale stadscultuur," 52-54, 255; and Symes, An Account, 252.
(74) Purchas, Purchas His Pilgrimes, 2:463,468, 470; Hamilton, A New Account, 2: 20-21, 73; and Niemeyer, "Calvinisme en koloniale stadscultuur," 260-61.
(75) Stamford Raffles, The History of lava (1817; reprint, Kuala Lumpur: Oxford University Press, 1965), 1: 340-42.
(76) Vladimir Braginsky, "The Gentleman in the Pink Hat, or the First Malay `Film': Notes on Syair Selambari or Syair Sinyor Kosta," Indonesia Circle 63 (June 1994):174-82.
(77) The case of a woman called Rokibar who had been abducted is reported at length in VOC 3525, Slave Reports (M), 25 February 1778, n.f.
(78) VOC 1099, Jambi to Batavia, 18 January 1631, 142-44.
(79) VOC 1226, Jambi to Batavia, 12 April 1657, 461v. For comments on the treatment of slaves, see John Bastin, ed., The British in West Sumatra (1685-1825) (Kuala Lumpur: University of Malaya Press, 1965), 143; J. S. Stavorinus, Voyages to the East Indies, trans. S. H. Wilcocke (1798; reprint, London: Dawsons, 1968), 1: 319.
(80) For Eurasian women, see Jean Gelman Taylor, The Social World of Batavia (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1983). For concubines in the nineteenth century, see Elsbeth Locher-Scholten, "The Nyai in Colonial Deli: A Case of Supposed Mediation," in Women and Mediation in Indonesia, ed. Sita van Bemmelen, et al., Verhandelingen van het Koninklijk Instituut, no. 152 (Leiden, the Netherlands: KILTV Press, 1992), 265-80.
(81) Jay Spaulding and Stephanie Beswick, "Sex, Bondage, and the Market: The Emergence of Prostitution in Northern Sudan, 1750-1950," Journal of the History of Sexuality 5, no. 4 (April 1995): 512-34. For an early modern parallel in Brazil, see Boxer, Mary and Misogyny, 20.
(82) Murray, No Money, No Honey, 116-18.
COPYRIGHT 1998 Indiana University Press
This material is published under license from the publisher through the Gale Group, Farmington Hills, Michigan. All inquiries regarding rights should be directed to the Gale Group

An alternative Vietnam? The Nguyen kingdom in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries

Dr. Li Tana (Australian National University)
Journal of Southeast Asian Studies; 3/1/1998

The seventeenth- and eighteenth-century Nguyen kingdom was known as Dang Trong to Vietnamese, and Cochinchina by the Westerners. In just 200 years it won control over three-fifths of the territory in modern Vietnam. The experiences of this expanding southern frontier area seem to suggest an image of Vietnam that is very different from the north, opening a door to an alternative world in which diversity was tolerated, and indeed exploited, for Vietnam's own development.
The seventeenth- and eighteenth-century Nguyen kingdom which controlled the area later known to the West as Cochinchina, had its origins in modern central Vietnam. The Nguyen annals portray Nguyen Hoang, the governor of Thuan Hoa and Quang Nam, which then marked the southern frontier of Dai Viet, as the founder of this kingdom of the south. War broke out in 1627 between the Nguyen in the south and the royal Le-Trinh government which controlled the region from Nghe An to the Red River delta. By creating a new state, the Nguyen put themselves into a rebellious position that was fraught with danger, for they were far weaker than the Trinh in almost every way. The north had well-established institutions, its territory was three or four times larger than that of the Nguyen, and it possessed correspondingly more military strength. In addition, the Trinh were established in an area occupied by ethnic Vietnamese and therefore governed their own people, while the Nguyen administration governed the former lands of Champa, an Indianized kingdom which had remarkably different traditions from those of the Vietnamese.(1) Yet the Nguyen government not only survived, defeating seven campaigns launched by the Trinh, but also progressively pushed its border further into the south, securing control over three-fifths of the territory that makes up present-day Vietnam in the space of just 200 years. Why did forces operating in a new environment survive, and triumph, while those that remained in familiar surroundings faltered?
Space to manoeuvre and the growth of new social elements seem to have provided a crucial stimulus for what would later develop into a society and polity far removed from the Confucian model of the Le dynasty. These differences can be seen in many aspects of life.(2) Where population growth and an accelerating cycle of natural disasters(3) made life increasingly insecure and impoverished in the Le/Trinh north, in the Nguyen south natural abundance prevailed, and the population was small. Where political and economic disasters from the late sixteenth to the early eighteenth centuries forced northern peasants against their will to quit their homes and drift to the southeast or the northwest, Vietnamese families in the dynamic Nguyen realm willingly moved to live amongst non-Vietnamese on the open, shifting frontier.
From the seventeenth century, the Red River delta ceased to be the only centre of Vietnamese civilization: a new centre - Phu Xuan (Hue) - challenged Thang Long (Hanoi), and a second important socio-economic zone - Thuan Quang - took shape far from the Red River delta. This was more than a simple southern extension of the former Vietnamese economy and society. Rather, a new society developed, with a different cultural background and quite different political and economic circumstances. As residents of a region over which the hostile Le/Trinh northern government never formally renounced control, southern Vietnamese described their territory as the "inner region" (Dang Trong), and characterized the northern Red River plains as the "outer region" (Dang Ngoai). The terminology indicates clearly that they perceived the south as a distinct entity, and the emergence of marked dissimilarities between the two areas amounted to two different ways of being Vietnamese.(4)
The formation of Dang Trong was a dramatic and fundamental change in Vietnamese history, comparable in significance to Vietnam's securing independence from China. At first sight, these events may seem, as they were often presented in nineteenth-century official histories, to be little more than the story of the survival and ultimate success of a family which had failed to advance itself in the Thang Long court; however, Nguyen successes produced a new society and a new culture. Economic factors played a decisive role: within a few short decades, Dang Trong became richer and stronger than the north (although not strong enough to topple the Trinh), despite being a newly-opened region, less populous and at this stage smaller than the old Red River delta. Both the economic condition of the people and the comparative openness of society in Dang Trong contrasted favourably with the so-called "central government" of the royal Le kingdom. These advantages formed the basis of the Vietnamese Nam Tien (southward expansion) which finally brought them to the Mekong delta.(5) Dang Trong became the historical engine of change, and pulled the national Vietnamese centre of gravity - whether seen in political, economic or even cultural terms - southwards from the seventeenth century until the imposition of French rule.(6)
A Non-Confucian, Buddhist South
For Vietnamese in the sixteenth and early seventeenth centuries, the south, and the idea of the south, meant something far more important than merely a place to live. The south offered a diversity of options. Occupying an "illegal" or "rebel" position gave the Nguyen a sense of freedom to try anything that seemed workable without reference to the constraining standards of Confucian morality. For instance, uniquely in Vietnamese history, the Nguyen allowed Japanese and Chinese to become government officials, and Westerners to have positions in the court, even if only as physicians. At the same time, the fact that they lived as part of the larger world of Southeast Asia enabled Vietnamese immigrants to borrow, blend and absorb extensively from the cultures of the Cham and other peoples in the region.
Under such circumstances, it was beneficial for the Nguyen regime to emphasize its local character. When proclaiming himself king in 1744, Nguyen Phuc Khoat declared proudly, "our country rose and developed from O Chau",(7) using a name with strong local colour for the place of origin of the royal family and many high officers. O Chau emphasized a perception of Dang Trong as a separate country that had developed since the early seventeenth century. This identification actually implied two meanings: a country equal to the north and a local rather than a foreign regime for the local people. The latter sense was related to legitimacy, and to the self-confidence of the Nguyen.
In comparison with the north, where the Chinese-style examination system ensured that neo Confucianism never lost its grip on the literati elite, Confucian ideas played a much reduced political and social role in Dang Trong. To borrow Nola Cooke's words:
Confucianism in Dang-trong became a matter of private choice and practice to an extent unknown in the north since the thirteenth-century. Indeed, so modest was its niche in the southern ideological spectrum that no-one even bothered to record when the first humble Confucian Temple of Literature Van Mieu was actually founded here.(8)
But the Nguyen did not reject other Vietnamese traditions; in particular they embraced Mahayana Buddhism as the solution to their spiritual and ideological needs as a new ruling family. Buddhism shored up the Vietnamese sense of ethnic identity and reinforced Nguyen legitimacy. From Nguyen Hoang on, the early Nguyen Lords (chua) were all devotees of Buddhism. Few matched the fervour of the sixth Nguyen ruler, Nguyen Phuc Chu (r. 1691-1725), who claimed to be in the thirtieth generation of the Lam Te (in Chinese, Lin ji) school of Buddhism.(9) This assertion is reminiscent of those kings of the eleventh-century Ly dynasty who became the first, third and fifth generations of the Thao Duong (in Chinese, cao tang) school, and of the Tran kings, Thai Ton and Nhan Ton, who were famous for their Truc Lam school. Yet nothing similar had been seen in northern Vietnam since the establishment of the Le dynasty, with its foundations in classical Chinese political theories. In the north the king was the pinnacle of society, its direct link to heaven, and thus superior to all other beings. For a king to become simply one among successive generations of any particular religious school would have been seen there as degrading. Freed from such imperial constraints, however, the Nguyen kings in Dang Trong were at liberty to practice their religion as they wished. Buddhism so flourished with Nguyen support that by 1749 the French traveller Pierre Poivre reported the existence of about 400 Buddhist temples around the Dang Trong capital alone, plus many more elsewhere.(10)
Where Buddhism was concerned, the real qualitative difference between the two polities in the north and the south lay at the court level, in the consistency with which the Nguyen championed syncretic Buddhism and made it in effect the state religion of Dang Trong. Admittedly both the Le kings and the Trinh Lords in the north also patronised Buddhism during these centuries, in some cases enthusiastically. At the height of revived literati influence in the 1660s, and only a few years after scholarly officials had prepared a consciously sinicising 47-article edict of moral education which attacked superstitious practices and restricted the unlicensed building of Buddhist pagodas,(11) the Trinh family itself had imported Chinese monks to renew local Buddhism in 1667. Trinh princes frequented Buddhist sites and went on pilgrimages, while one family member founded a new sect. However, despite this high level patronage, no one in the north ever believed Buddhism could challenge the Chinese political concepts and official ideology that formed "the vital principle of the state".(12) Rather, Buddhism was sanctioned in the north very much on the basis that it was a vehicle of personal salvation which posed no threat to the established political order.(13) Had it been otherwise, Buddhism would no doubt have been as tightly controlled as Catholic Christianity, whose foreign origins and European associations created suspicions among the authorities in both north and south at the time.
That southern Buddhism was highly syncretic gave it a more inclusive appeal. The most famous temple in Hue, the Thien Mu, is a striking example of how different religious currents combined and of how, from Nguyen Hoang onwards, the new rulers were able to weave these various strands into a local religious pattern which domesticated and supported their own power. Thien Mu stood on a hill whose geomantic force was so powerful that, local legend held, it had forced a ninth-century Chinese governor to try to neutralize its dragon vein by digging a ditch across it. The site also housed an important Chain temple dedicated to the great earth goddess Po Nagar. According to Vietnamese legend, in 1600 the goddess miraculously appeared in the form of an old women, a "Heavenly Mother" whose description combined elements of Po Nagar and the Taoist Queen of Heaven. She announced that the true lord of the land had arrived and would restore the dragon vein beneath the hill by building a pagoda to concentrate its spirit forces. Whether this prophecy was made before or after Nguyen Hoang symbolically fulfilled it by building such a structure in 1601 may never be known. What matters here is that when the first Nguyen Lord consciously erected a Buddhist pagoda on this site of great spirit potency, he was making a gesture of great political significance. If, as Nguyen The Anh has recently reported, this was a symbolic construction on the site of an existing temple whose spirit had not been officially recognized by the Le court, the act was even more charged with local meaning.(14)
As for Po Nagar herself, this principal Cham goddess was soon Vietnamized into Thien-Y-A-Na, and the area around Hue came to abound with her shrines. In the early twentieth century Leopold Cadiere listed so many of them still extant that Nguyen The Anh has suggested "the Nguyen center of power never ceased to be steeped in an atmosphere deeply influenced by the spiritual imprint of this deity".(15) Certainly in this area her worship remained unconstrained, and close to its Cham roots. There were additional objects of veneration among the common people, such as stones (tho da), crocodiles (tho ca sau), or tigers (tho cop).(16) "Mountains, forests, rivers, the memory of ancestors, respect for the dead and especially spirits are subjects of worship.... There is a god for each man's fancy", Poivre said.(17) While northern popular religion also contained a similar pantheon of animal and mineral objects of veneration, the authorities there tried to take measures to "purify the society". Nothing similar happened in the south, where the Nguyen court sought to patronize rather than penalize local deities, recognizing that southern gods and goddesses were as diverse as southern society itself.
Similarities with other parts of Southeast Asia extended to kingship. As O.W. Wolters has pointed out, in Southeast Asia "the king's status was unique only because it was a religious one".(18) This is probably the reason the Nguyen proclaimed themselves thien vuong (king of heaven) in 1744, after having earlier used the title chua Sai (Buddhist Priest Lord). Da Shan, a Chinese Buddhist monk who visited Cochinchina in 1695 observed that the palace of Nguyen Phuc Chu was decorated with Buddhist flags, hangings, wooden fishes, and inverted bells, just like a Buddhist temple.(19) By adopting these symbols, the Nguyen showed their subjects they combined religious and royal authority in Dang Trong, and represented their national and cultural identities to the Vietnamese while indicating to local people where the highest authority in the region lay. Probably following the lead of their southern neighbours, Nguyen practices resembled what rulers of kingdoms such as Champa and Cambodia had been doing for centuries. The Nguyen also differentiated themselves from the Trinh, who believed in the Confucian idea that the emperor was the son of heaven, but not part of heaven itself.(20)
This non-Confucian pattern worked so curiously well in the society of Dang Trong that it allowed Vietnamese there to live in a different way from the northerners. In the late eighteenth-century it is striking to see a Tay Son general in Nghe An poking fun at xa tac, an important Confucian deity associated with land and crops, and much revered in the north, saying: "A dog is more useful than the xa tac!"(21) This deity was largely unknown to the mass of Dang Trong society; according to the modern Vietnamese scholar Ta Chi Dai Truong, xa tac temples did not make their appearance until the reign of Minh Mang (1819-41), when the later Nguyen dynasty, now ruling all of Vietnam, made an effort to unify religious thinking throughout the country.(22) The incident illustrates the growing difference in religious beliefs between Dang Trong and Dang Ngoai after two centuries of separation. Many old values from the north had lost their meaning, while something as heretical to orthodox northerners as a Cham goddess had become meaningful to the people of Dang Trong. Buddhism - criticized for centuries by the Confucian scholars of the later Tran and Le dynasties - became the leading religion, both at the level of official policy and popular belief in Dang Trong.
The easy mobility in the south also clashed directly with the primacy of the collectivity, a basic Confucian tenet that emphasized the value of the social group - the family, the village - above the needs or desires of its constituent members. Individuals had little worth or purpose in isolation but only mattered in terms of how they discharged a number of fixed relationships within the community. In other words, anyone who lacked standing in a social group, like the family or the village, was less than a full person and could hope for no better future in traditional village society. Such people seem to have formed one of the main currents in the stream of Vietnamese immigrants to the far south. As one Vietnamese scholar, Huynh Lua, has described it, the south was a place for "those who did not have the right to live on the older opened land".(23) Hickey, too, has underlined the same point:
With the new village [of the south] therefore being established by lower status people rather than the patricians of the traditional society, a certain amount of esoteric knowledge concerning the old ways was inevitably lost.... By the same token, however, the pioneers were less bound by the highly restrictive social ranking and the behaviour expectations of the older society, so they were free to innovate, an essential feature of their successful adjustment (and survival) as they moved continually southward.(24)
Such circumstances prompted people to be more open and spontaneous, to be risk takers like Nguyen Hoang, whom Keith Taylor has perceptively described as daring "to risk being pronounced a rebel, because he had found a place where this no longer mattered".(25) It was a larger world, and gave people a greater sense of freedom.
Social Aspects of Vietnamese Localization
The immigrant character of Dang Trong was further modified by its environment in its early days. The population was scattered and food and resources were abundant and easily available, a pattern resembling Dang Trong's Southeast Asian neighbours rather than the Dong Ngoai area in the north. It was natural, therefore, for them to adopt the ways of material life of other people in the region.
We know, for example, that up to the late eighteenth century most of the common people's houses in Dang Trong were raised on poles as in other Southeast Asian countries, and a Malay type of ship, the ghe bau, was widely used between the sixteenth and nineteenth centuries. This ship-building technique was almost certainly borrowed from the Cham by the Vietnamese, for the Chares traded extensively with the Malays, and the region of its use extended from Hoi An southward to Thuan Hai,(26) the area once occupied by the Cham. Some Vietnamese scholars even suggest that not only the technology but also the words ghe and bau were borrowed from Malay. They point out the similarity of Vietnamese word ghe and Malay gai (a rope or stay used to hold a mast), and suggest that bau was a corrupt pronunciation of Malay prahu (a small boat).(27) The similarity was striking enough for John Barrow to observe in 1793 that vessels in the Tourane region resembled the common proas of the Malays, both as to their hulls and rigging".(28)
Cham influence is also seen in Vietnamese farming tools. The plough used by Vietnamese in the northern Red River and Ma River deltas is not strong at its base and has a small tongue, but it is light and easy for one animal to pull. This kind of plough is suitable for earth which is not compacted, and where the grass is not thick. The features are characteristic of the lands in the north - cultivated for thousands of years by a dense population - and the plough is only found north of the Gianh River, which marked the border between Dang Ngoai and Dang Trong. In Dang Trorig the Vietnamese encountered land that was thick with grass and hard to farm. To turn the soil here the Vietnamese adapted the Cham plough, which was stronger, especially at the base, but added a nang (follicle) to adjust the angle. Parts of this new plough taken from the Cham model have Cham names, while the parts that have to do with the nang have Vietnamese names. This new plough was brought south by the Vietnamese as they moved to the Mekong delta.(29)
In central Vietnam, Cham culture was so ubiquitous that it has survived in Vietnamese customs there up to the present: from the consumption of raw food (an goi) to the way hair is wrapped into a piece of cloth (doi khan)(30) to burial in Cham style graves, although the:Vietnamese themselves are not necessarily aware of the origin of these practices? Amazingly, even mam nem, the fish sauce that typifies Vietnamese cuisine, according to some Vietnamese scholars may actually have a Cham origin. One Vietnamese scholar of southern customs has even pointed to the great similarity between the so-called "traditional" Vietnamese women's dress, the ao clai, which every Vietnamese woman wears for special occasions today, and the dress of Chain women (tah in Chum); only the addition of a collar distinguishes the ao dai. This style is very different indeed from the ao tu than, the long, open and sleeveless garment that was formal wear for northern Vietnamese women before the twentieth century.(32)
Perhaps the most important characteristic which made the new southern Vietnamese different from Vietnamese in the north was their attitude towards overseas trade. Dang Trong was born in an "age of commerce".(33) The weak agricultural base available to seventeenth-century Dang Trong could hardly sustain a desperate struggle with the superior forces of the Trinh north, and the early Nguyen were compelled to flout the practice of all previous Vietnamese states and allow fairly free trade. Although this was unusual in itself, what quickly followed was previously virtually unknown: the Nguyen themselves became enthusiasts for foreign trade, and for foreigners. When the opportunity arose, they lost no time in linking Dang Trong with Chinese and Japanese trade routes. The fact that one-quarter of all officially licensed (Red Seal) Japanese ships traded with Dang Trong, and 30 per cent of Chinese junks travelling from Southeast Asian countries to Japan between 1647 and 1720 departed from Dang Trorig, shows that in the seventeenth century the region became a key Japanese trading partner, and a significant player in wider Asian commercial relations.(34) Cochinchina's independent existence, and the Nguyen's own power and wealth, rested largely on this overseas trade, a situation unique in all pre-colonial Vietnamese history. By following the Cham example, seventeenth-century Cochinchina found the resources and vitality to undergo a great period of expansion in population, wealth and land, despite having to fight a war with the north that lasted for 50 years. This characteristic of Dang Trong alone draws a line between itself and earlier traditional Vietnam, which had a weak commodity economy.
The southern Vietnamese also adopted other cram practices like piracy and elephant fighting.(35) In particular, the slave trade, which would have seemed deviant in the north, was a normal part of Vietnamese life in the new environment, as Poivre discovered in 1750:
I asked the king to give me at least several savages or slaves to be craftsmen (because the slaves in this region are only those barbarians who were caught by Cochinchinese from the mountains). The king answered that it was not difficult, but he suggested I wait until the next year, and he promised me that he would supply me with as many slaves as I wanted by then. He added that this year I could only manage to buy two kinds of slaves: one kind was uncivilised since they were only caught lately and were not well trained and could therefore do nothing useful, the other kind were the ones who had become familiar with this region and trained in certain techniques. But soon after I bought them they would escape, because they desperately wanted to go back to their wives and children.(36)
Clearly the Nguyen Ruler was familiar with slavery, and the trade in uplanders was so accepted that the court taxed it at the same rate as the trade in elephants in the Thuan Hoa area.(37) In this as in other sphere of life, the Nguyen must have found that adopting local cultural practices was both convenient and advantageous. Perhaps it would not be too far from the truth to say that the Nguyen's strength actually lay precisely in their localization.
The Nguyen also radically differed from the Trinh in their policies toward the Chinese. Having lived in the shadow of China and its invasions, Vietnamese rulers in the north were always extremely wary of the Chinese, but the Nguyen had a remarkably relaxed attitude towards the Chinese, and allowed significant Chinese trading communities to take shape in Hue, Hoi An, Quy Nhon, and later in Saigon. By the end of the eighteenth century the Chinese population in southern Vietnam was perhaps between 30 and 40 thousand.(38) At the end of the seventeenth century, the Nguyen secured control of the Bien Hoa and My Tho areas in the upper Mekong delta from Cambodia, largely due to the efforts of some 3,000 Ming refugees from Guangdong who had been directed to settle there when they arrived in 1679 seeking asylum from the Qing. Ha Tien, another strategically important port area on the Khmer-Viet border, came into Nguyen hands through the activities of Mac Cuu, a Ming refugee from Guangdong, in the early eighteenth century. All three locations developed prosperous towns and attracted foreign trade at the expense of Cambodia, formerly the dominant power in the area. In these townships the Chinese were the merchants and artisans, and some were appointed to official positions as custom officers, a situation unique in Vietnamese history. In 1698, the Nguyen ended the semi-autonomous position of the Chinese in the Mekong delta by establishing Gia Dinh prefecture. They registered the resident Chinese population in two villages of "Ming loyalists" (Minh huong), treating them as permanent residents rather than regarding them as merchant sojourners. This made the Nguyen the earliest administration in Southeast Asia to adopt such a localization policy.39 Under such favourable conditions, the Chinese played an intricate role in the Tay Son period, with both the prince Nguyen Anh and his enemy the rebel Tay Son brothers turning to the Chinese as a source of manpower and economic strength.
Conclusion
The development of a localized Vietnamese identity in Dang Trong seems to have been a successful response to a new environment. This is not to say that the Vietnamese in Dang Trong became "non-Vietnamese". Rather, as Keith Taylor has suggested, the area allowed for the creation of an alternative "version of being Vietnamese distinguished by relative freedom from the Vietnamese past",(40) particularly from the immediate past of the Confucian model that had been in operation since the Le dynasty in the north. The two-century Nguyen period shaped many traits characteristic of southerners, such as their curiosity and tolerance towards new things and new ideas, their more open and spontaneous character, and their willingness not to be fettered by history and tradition.
Although the changes during this period no doubt played a constructive role in Vietnamese culture, they also created disruptions in communal solidarity which the nineteenth-century Vietnamese literati who wrote the official history of these centuries found unacceptable. A manuscript kept in the Hah-Nom Institute of Hanoi says that in the second year of Ming Mang's reign (1820) the emperor ordered the Historical Board of the Kingdom (Quoc Su Quan) to compile a history of the kingdom, specifying that "the style, the way of expression and the facts are to be weighed and considered before being recorded".(41) Much information was omitted in this process of weighing and considering. Throughout the nineteenth century, historians tended to ignore or play down unorthodox or non-Confucian aspects of Dang Trong society, such as slavery and contacts with the Cham, Japanese, and Khmer, no doubt in an attempt to achieve the desired compromises and balances.
The Nguyen regime has not fared much better at the hands of modern Vietnamese scholars. As David Marr has pointed out, twentieth-century Vietnamese historians have often been "asked to balance the elements of continuity in their story against the elements of change".(42) National unity and resistance to aggression are two themes seen as central to Vietnamese experience, and the Nguyen regime contravened both principles. First, Dang Trong destroyed national unity for two hundred years. Second, writing about the aftermath of the massive Tay Son rebellion which destroyed the Nguyen regime in 1774, Hanoi historians credit the victorious Tay Son general Nguyen Hue (emperor Quang Trung) with reuniting the country when his rebel armies went on to defeat the Trinh, and then with suppressing a Chinese invasion in 1789. However, Nguyen Anh, the last survivor of the Nguyen lords, subsequently defeated the much-praised Tay Son heroes with the help of foreigners, among them French missionaries and military officers, whom Hanoi historians regard as the forerunners of Western colonialism. Possibly because of this, official Hanoi historians have devoted little attention to Dang Trong on grounds that it represented merely a local variant of a common history whose referent was the Le/Trinh north.(43) They have treated the northern kingdom of "Dai Viet" in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries as a single entity spanning all Vietnamese regions and displaying general "Vietnamese characteristics". This representation of "a single Vietnamese past" was accepted for many decades by modern scholars both in and outside Vietnam.(44)
The present article argues that two "Dai Viets" existed at the time, and that the southern one had a significant effect on Vietnamese history because it exhibited "a far more multidimensional consciousness of Vietnamese identity".(45) The Nguyen experiment opened an alternative door of development for Vietnam. It provided a new space in which the styles of the Vietnamese newcomers and their neighbours could interact, and suggests that Vietnamese society, even as late as the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, could thrive more or less outside a Confucian framework. And it marks a rare historical moment when the Vietnamese had an opportunity to reinterpret their tradition in a fresh and lively way. Eventually this door was shut when order became a paramount social concern of the Nguyen dynasty after 1802, established on the rains of a generation of civil war. From Minh Mang's reign onward, the dynasty strove to present an orthodox, stable, and grander image of Vietnam to the outside world. The seventeenth- and eighteenth-century history of Vietnamese society in Dang Trong was re-written by Confucian scholars in the nineteenth century out of a need to "tell right from wrong", and to set "good examples" for the future according to Confucian tradition. But if the society that took shape in Dang Trong during the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries was deliberately overlooked by the official historians of the nineteenth century, this omission has left a fascinating space for later historians to explore. The present article, I hope, makes a small contribution to this effort.
I am grateful to Nola Cooke for providing extensive comments on a preliminary draft of this article.
1 For the most significant discovery which revolutionises our understanding of Champa, see Po Dharma, Le Panduranga (Campa) 1802-1835. Ses rapports avec le Vietnam (Paris: EFEO, 1987), 2 vol. (Paris: Travaux du Centre d'histoire et Civilisations de la Peninsule Indochinoise, 1988), especially Bernard Gay, "Vue nouvelle sur le composition ethnique du Campa", pp. 49-56, and Po Dharma, "Etat des derniers recherches sur la date de l'absorption du Campa par le Vietnam", pp. 59-70. See also Pierre-Bernard Lafont, "Les grandes dates de l'histoire du Campa", in Le Campa et la Monde Malais (Paris: Centre d'Histoire et Civilisations de la Peninsule Indochinoise, 1991), pp. 6-25.
2 For an illuminating discussion of the two societies, see Keith Taylor, "Regional Conflicts among the Viet People between the 13th and 19th centuries", paper presented at a seminar entitled "La conduite des relations entre societes et etats: Guerre et paix en Asie du Sud-Est", Paris, July 1996, pp. 7-8.
3 According to Sakurai's statistics of 49 floods in the Red River delta between 1422 and 1786, 22 occurred in the last 100 years. See Yumio Sakurai, "A Study on the Peasant Drain during Le Dynasty in Vietnam", To-nan A ja kenkyu 1,16 (1978): 137.
4 The terms Dang Trong and Dang Ngoai apparently originated in the 1620s, either before or soon after war broke out between the Trinh and the Nguyen. Alexandre de Rhodes's dictionary, published in 1651 contains both terms. See his Dictionarivm Annamiticvm, Lvsitanvm, et Latinvmope (Rome: Typis & Sumptibus eiusdem Sacr. Congreg, 1651), p. 201.
5 For a discussion on the term "nam tien", see Keith Taylor, "Regional Conflicts", pp. 6-11.
6 See Li Tana, Nguyen Cochinchina: Southern Vietnam in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries (Ithaca: Cornell Southeast Asia Program Monograph, 1998).
7 Dai Nam Thuc Luc Tien Bien (Chronicle of Greater Vietnam, Premier Period of the Nguyen, hereafter Tien Bien (Tokyo: Keio Institute of Linguistic Studies, Mita, Siba, Minato-ku, 1961), vol. 10, p. 136.
8 Nola Cooke, "Nineteenth-Century Vietnamese Confucianization in Historical Perspective: Evidence from the Palace Examinations (1463-1883)", Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 25,2 (Sep. 1994): 284.
9 This claim appeared in his 1715 inscription on a Thien Mu stele. Ngu Kien Thien Mu Tu Bi (The royal inscription on a bell in Thien Mu temple), shelf number 5683, Han-Nom Institute, Hanoi.
10 P. Poivre, "Journal de voyage du vaisseau de la compagnie le Machault a la Cochinchine depuis le 29 aout 1749, jour de notre arrivee, au 11 fevrier 1750", reprod. by H. Cordier in Revue de l'Extreme Orient, III (1885), p. 381. Today Hue has several hundred temples and is called the "capital of Buddhism". See Thanh Tung, Tham Chua Hue (Hue: Hoi Van Nghe Thanh Pho Hue, 1989), p. 3.
11 Tien Bien, vol. 19, p. 974; Le Trieu Chieu Lenh Thien Chinh [The benevolent edicts of the Le dynasty] (Saigon: Binh Mirth, 1961), p. 311; K.W. Taylor, "The Literaft Revival in Seventeenth-Century Vietnam", Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 18,1 (1987): 1-23.
12 Philippe Langlet, La Tradition vietnamienne: un etat national au sein de la civilisation chinoise (Saigon: BSEI, 1970), pp. 70-71, quote p. 71.
13 Insun Yu, Law and Society in Seventeenth and Eighteenth Century Vietnam (Seoul: Asiatic Research Center, Korea University, 1990), p. 29.
14 Cooke, "Vietnamese Confucianism", pp. 283-84; Nguyen The Anh, "The Vietnamization of the Cham Deity Po Nagar", in Essays into Vietnamese Pasts, ed. Keith Taylor and John Whitmore (Ithaca: SEAP, Cornell University, 1995), p. 49. See also A. Bonhomme, "La pagode Thien-Mau: Historique", in Bulletin des Amis du Vieux Hue 2,2 (1915): 175-77.
15 Nguyen The Anh, "The Vietnamization of Po Nagar", p. 49.
16 Nguyen Cong Binh, Le Xuan Diem & Mac Duong, Van Hoa & cu dan Dong Bang Song Cuu Long [Culture and Residents in the Mekong Delta Region] (Ho Chi Minh City: Khoa Hoc Xa Hoi, 1990), pp. 376-77.
17 "Description of Cochinchina, 1749-50", in Documents on the Economic History of Nguyen Vietnam, 1602-1774, ed. Anthony Reid and Li Tana (Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies/ECHOSEA, Australian National University, 1993), p. 84.
18 O.W. Wolters, History, Culture, and Region in Southeast Asian Perspectives (Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, 1982), p. 19.
19 Da Shan, "Hai Wai Ji Shi", in Shi Qi Shi Ji Guang Nan zhi Xin Shi Liao, ed. Chen Chingho (Taipei: Zhong Hua Cong Shu Bian Sheng Wei Yuan Hui, 1960), p. 15.
20 Ta Chi Dai Truong, Than, Nguoi va Dat Viet [Deities, people and the land of Viet] (California: Van Nghe Press, 1989), pp. 220-23.
21 The comments on "xa tac", made by Cao Huy Dieu in the early nineteenth-century, are reproduced in Viet Dien U Linh Tap [Anthology of the spirits of the departed of the Vietnamese domain], trans. into Vietnamese by Le Huu Muc (Saigon: Khai Tri, 1961), p. 218.
22 Ta Chi Dai Truong, Than, Nguoi va Dat Viet, p. 235.
23 Huynh Lua, "Qua trinh khai pha vung Dong Nai-Cuu Long va hinh thanh mot so tinh cach, nep song va tap quan cua nguoi hong dan Nam Bo" (Process of opening the Mekong delta and of forming some characteristics and customs of southern peasants), in May dac diem Dong bang Song Cuu Long [Some characteristics of the Mekong Delta] (Hanoi: Vien Van Hoa, 1984), p. 121.
24 Hickey, "The Vietnamese Village Through Time and War", The Vietnam Forum 10 (1987): 18.
25 Keith Taylor, "Nguyen Hoang", p. 64.
26 Thuan Hai is an old name for Phan Rang Province.
27 Nguyen Boi Lien, Tran Van An and Nguyen Van Phi, "Ghe bau Hoi An - Xu Quang" [Ghe bau junks in the Hoi An-Quang Nam area], paper given at the International Symposium on the Ancient Town of Hoi An, March 1990, pp. 2-3.
28 John Barrow, A Voyage to Cochinchina, in the years 1792 and 1793 (Kuala Lumpur: reprinted by Oxford University Press, 1975), p. 319.
29 Ngo Duc Thinh and Nguyen Viet, "Cac loai hinh cay hien dai cua dan toc o Dong Nam A" (Types of ploughs in Southeast Asia), Tap Chi Khao Co Hoc (Journal of Archaeology) 4 (1981): 55-56.
30 This Chain way of decorating their hair is recorded in the fifteenth century by Fei Xin in his Xing Jue Sheng Lan (Beijing: Zhong Hua Shu Ju, 1954), p. 3.
31 The graves around the Hue area are quite different from those elsewhere in Vietnam, both to the north and to the south. I am grateful to Prof. Do Van Ninh, who kindly pointed out to me that they are exactly in old Cham style.
32 Phan Thi Yen Tuyet, Nha o, trang phuc, an uong cua cac dan toc vung Dong bang song Cuu Long (Housing, clothes and food of the peoples in the Mekong delta region) (Hanoi: Khoa Hoc Xa Hoi, 1993), pp. 92, 290.
33 Anthony Reid, Southeast Asia in the Age of Commerce, 1450-1680, vols. 1 & 2 (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1988, 1993).
34 For details, see Li Tana, Nguyen Cochinchina, chs. 3 and 4.
35 In 1749 Poivre saw 12 tigers killed by 40 elephants in a single day for the amusement of the king and his officials.
36 See Poivre, "Journal", p. 439.
37 Le Quy Don, Phu Bien Tap Luc (Miscellaneous records of Pacification in the Border Area), written in 1776 (Saigon: Phu Quoc Vu Khanh Dac Trach Van Hoa, 1973), vol. 4, pp. 5a-5b.
38 The Vietnamese official source gives 20,241 Minh Huong Chinese in Quang Nam alone in 1805. Chau Ban, Vol. 1, Trieu Gia Long (the files of the Gia Long reign) kept in the National Archives no. 1, Hanoi. Crawfurd estimated Chinese population in Saigon in 1822 as between two and three thousand. See John Crawfurd, Journal of an Embassy to the Courts of Siam and Cochin China (Singapore: Oxford University Press, 1967), p. 214. In Hoi An alone the Chinese population was estimated at four to five thousand in 1642. See "A Japanese Resident's Account", in Southern Vietnam under the Nguyen, ed. Li and Reid, p. 31.
39 Wang Gungwu, "Sojourning: The Chinese Experience in Southeast Asia", in Sojourners and Settlers: Histories of Southeast Asia and the Chinese, ed. Anthony Reid (Sydney: Allen & Unwin, 1996), p. 7.
40 Keith Taylor, "Nguyen Hoang and the beginning of Viet Nam's southward expansion", in Southeast Asia in the Early Modern Era, ed. Anthony Reid (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1993).
41 See Han Cac Tap Luc, Shelf No. A.1463, Hah-Nom Institute, p. 18.
42 David Marr, Vietnamese Anticolonialism, 1885-1925 (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1971), p. 4.
43 For political reasons during and after the Vietnam War, seventeenth- and eighteenth-century Dang Trong received almost no mention in Vietnamese history textbooks published in Hanoi, while scholars in the south such as Ta Chi Dai Truong and Phan Khoang made spectacular efforts to incorporate information on Dang Trong in Lich su noi chien o Viet Nam and Viet su xu Dang Trong during the late 1960s and early 1970s.
44 Keith Taylor, "Preface", in Essays into Vietnamese Pasts, ed. K.W. Taylor and John Whitmore (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1995), p. 5.
45 A. Woodside, "Political theory and Economic Growth in Late Traditional Vietnam", paper read at the conference on "The Last Stand of Autonomous States in Southeast Asia and Korea" (Bali, 1994), p.15.
COPYRIGHT 1998 Singapore University Press Pte Ltd.
This material is published under license from the publisher through the Gale Group, Farmington Hills, Michigan. All inquiries regarding rights should be directed to the Gale Group